Pejuang Syahid wrote:That is... assuming they really did only $5 per day through one of the winning niche.
Ever heard the terms home run?
And... do you really think all niches found through Blasting made only $5 per day??
The sort of guy with calibre like Kai Kiske only depends on a niche of $5 a day??
Not sure about you but I doubt that he really did only $5 per winning niche out of his blasting efforts.
Most of the niche found through blasting could very well earn up until $200 to $500 per week.
If you hit home run... it is basically one night riches.
Call me a positive thinker or way too optimistic in this... but this is how I've been living
with internet marketing all this while.
What do I mean??
Positivity. I don't know about most of you... but being positive thinker in a lot of things in IM
has helped me conquer most of the unforeseen variables that otherwise would cr[a]ck most of the
negative thinkers.
$5 bucks a day merely acts as a catalyst for Kai Kiske.
Campaign Blasting is a whole different system not related with $5 bucks a day at all.
It becomes related... because Kai Kiske decided that limiting the expectations per day
would tremendously helped him in this aspect. And it does... a couple of week starting
and he only made $5 to $50 per day a niche.
Things improve after that... a lot of variables has been understood. Winning niches started
to strike about $100 to $500. One of the winning niche that I helped design a website for him...
in gaming niche... earned him $45,000 in 3 weeks. All of this are found are through blasting.
Ofcourse... I'm a mere student that see and learn all of this step.. I myself haven't had the
opportunity to dive into the campaign blasting method it self.
And most people who knew of this method aren't really that willing to share it with others.
Matt are selling it for a steal. Kai's improvise blasting method are only for those willing
to pay him for personal coaching.
Perhaps it is indeed a good idea for you to be a negative thinker after all??
Don't waste your time on something you didn't have faith in
Again... campaign blasting is a system.
$5 bucks a day is merely a mindset. It is not a system at all. Nothing related to strategy whatsoever. Merely a mindset.
Just a side note... from one person who learn blasting as well and implement it with $5 per day
mindset:
Q: The Adwords route rarely works as you stated. That is why only 1-12 work,
with that rate no one would be a success at any venture. Few people have any interest
in setting up landing pages etc... they don't have the know how, money or experience to
drive people there successfully. I have done many of these and have talked with many
others online that can never get it right. Great that it is working well for you on occasion
and you are making money, you are the exception.
A: Yes, I believe I mentioned above that 1 out of 10 or 15 AdWords campaigns should be
successful, if you do it right, and the others, the vast majority, will fail. At first, prior to
understanding the 5 Buck a Day strategy, or the Campaign Blasting strategy, you would
think that fact would discourage most from even trying. And yes, it will discourage most,
including our reader above.
But it shouldn’t, if you look at it from a different angle. You see, this isn’t like wagering
on a coin flip, a roll of the dice, or a football game. AdWords marketing, combined with
campaign blasting, is very powerful. Let’s illustrate:
On week 1, you start 15 AdWords campaigns. Just for the sake of simplicity, let’s say
you let each one run until you get $10 worth of clicks and evaluate the results. Let’s say
that sure enough, 14 of them lost money, and 1 made money. In the simplistic
example, let’s say that the 14 all lost exactly $10, even though we know that some will
have some sales, and lose maybe only $3 or $7, but let’s say they all lose $10 each, for
a total in the hole of $140. At the same time, let’s say our winner made $10, so we’re in
the hole $130. And let’s say it took 2 days to get these results.
What’s happened here is 14 campaigns lost 5 bucks a day, 1 campaign made 5 bucks a
day. Most people would be discouraged. But I would be absolutely thrilled, because I
could just delete the 14 losers, and let the winner keep going. And let’s say it continues
to make 5 bucks a day for the rest of the week, so actually we made $35 and lost $140,
a net loss of $105 for the week.
With me so far?
On week 2, you start 15 more, different, campaigns. If 14 of them lose a total of $140,
and the other one makes $10, in 2 days, then we have the same results as week one.
So did we lose another $105?
If you’re with me so far, you know the answer is NO, we didn’t lose $105, because our
winning campaign from week 1 continues to make 5 bucks a day, another $35 profit, so
we only lost $70 for the week. Right? If you don’t understand, take pencil and paper
and start charting the money flow.
On week 3, same thing. Lose $140, make $35 each from the week 1, week 2, and
week 3 winners. We’re still losing money, it seems, but are we? Personally I’m getting
as excited as can be with my good fortune.
Week 4, same thing. Lose $140, make $35 each from week 1, 2, 3, and 4 winner
campaigns. Do the math, you’ll find we broke even this week cash flow wise.
Week 5, 6, 7, 8, at this point we’re rolling. Money is coming in left and right. We’re in
profits, and it gets better every week. And there’s no looking back.
Do you see what happened here? Every week, we “invest” $150 into a total of 15
AdWords campaigns. For a while we’re putting more into the pot than we’re taking out.
After a while though, it all turns into positive cash flow. In a perfect world, at the end of
52 weeks, we’ll have 52 winners, each making 5 bucks a day. 52 times $35 per week
equals $1,820 for the week, minus the $140 investment into finding the losers.
$1,820 per week is $94,640 per year. Some people would stop investing and live on
that amount. Would you?So do you understand the problem with the thought process of our reader? Even if 14
out of 15 campaigns fail, we’re only letting the 14 fail for a short time, we’re letting the 1
winner win forever.
Home
